NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Former President Barack Obama criticized President Donald Trump’s approach to artificial intelligence on Friday, calling for stronger federal regulation as the technology rapidly advances and concerns grow over safety, jobs and human control.
“The challenge we have is that, obviously, we have a president currently that has said that’s for losers,” Obama said during an appearance at Colgate University in Hamilton, New York. “So we’ve got a gap of at least a couple of years, where things are moving really fast, and we have an administration that is not capable of or willing to — I would argue both — putting together a serious regulatory framework.”
Obama’s remarks expanded on a warning he issued last week, when he privately urged Democrats to make AI a central political issue.
DEMOCRATS EMBRACED AI’S GROWTH BEFORE TRUMP CAME ALONG — NOW THEY WANT TO SLOW IT DOWN
RNC member and Humans First Chairwoman Amy Kremer told Fox News Digital last week that policymakers should recognize AI’s risks without handing greater control to Washington or the technology companies themselves.
“You don’t have to agree on politics to recognize reality: AI is moving incredibly fast, and policymakers need to understand both the opportunities and the very real risks that come with it,” she said.
“Where I likely disagree with President Obama is on what government should do about it. The answer isn’t handing Washington bureaucrats more control, and it certainly isn’t allowing Big Tech to write the rules that govern itself,” she said.
“We need guardrails that protect Americans while allowing American innovation to lead the world. That means protecting children, workers and our national security, while making sure China doesn’t win the AI race,” she continued.
AI ‘DOOMERS’ RISK KNEECAPPING US VS CHINA, BUT EX-PENTAGON VET SAYS BOTH EXTREMES MISS THE MARK
The debate shifted again Saturday when Trump announced the creation of an “AI Force” and said he plans to appoint an AI czar, while reiterating that his administration would resist efforts to slow development as the United States competes with China.
“We will not in any way hinder or stifle the Growth of this incredible Industry,” Trump said in a lengthy Truth Social post.
Obama, speaking during Colgate’s Family Weekend, argued that relying on companies’ financial incentives and potential liability was insufficient to manage the risks posed by increasingly capable AI systems.
“[The] government has to be regulating this!” Obama said. “I heard one of Donald Trump’s main advisors on this make the argument that, ‘The market will take care of it. These companies will solve the safety issues because they have every incentive to do so — if it turns out to be dangerous, people will just sue them, and they’re worried about financial liability.’ That’s not how we treat airlines! Or drug companies, or food companies.”
Obama’s characterization of the administration came as the White House has pursued its own AI policy framework, though one focused heavily on encouraging development and limiting regulations it considers burdensome.
The Trump administration unveiled a national legislative framework in March addressing child safety, free speech, workforce issues and energy costs while calling for a consistent national approach to AI policy.
TRUMP’S DATA CENTER PUSH FRACTURES CONGRESS AS LOCAL ANGER EXPLODES: ‘GRASPING AT STRAWS’
Trump also signed a national security directive in June ordering agencies to accelerate adoption of advanced AI while requiring systems used in national security settings to be “robust, steerable, controllable” and subject to clear lines of accountability.
The disagreement has intensified as executives inside the AI industry themselves call for additional safeguards. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei urged companies last week to slow the pace of improvements to frontier models, while OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Elon Musk expressed support for greater caution.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment, but did not immediately hear back.