Houston Man Charged With Murder After Shooting 11-Year-Old Over ‘Ding Dong Ditch’ Prank

A 42-year-old man in Houston has been charged with murder after fatally shooting an 11-year-old boy who was running away from a doorbell prank. Authorities say the boy was participating in a “ding dong ditch” game when he was shot in the back while fleeing the suspect’s home.
LISTEN TO THIS ARTICLE
HOUSTON, TX (3-minute read) — A Texas man has been arrested and charged with murder following the tragic shooting death of an 11-year-old boy who was taking part in a doorbell prank on Saturday night. The prank, commonly known as “ding dong ditch,” involves ringing a home’s doorbell and then running away before the homeowner answers.
Houston police confirmed that 42-year-old Leon Gonzalo Jr. was taken into custody Tuesday morning and booked into jail. His home address matches the location where the child was shot. Witnesses told police that the boy was fleeing Gonzalo’s home when the fatal shot was fired.
The young boy, whose name has not yet been made public, was transported to a local hospital but later succumbed to his injuries. According to the police report, there is no indication the child posed any threat; he was simply running away, likely laughing and unaware of the danger he was in.
Man Charged After Prank Turns Deadly
Police have not said whether Gonzalo provided any justification for the shooting, but under Texas law, deadly force is not typically permitted in response to minor property offenses, especially when the suspect is fleeing. Texas’s Castle Doctrine allows for self-defense in one’s home, but a fleeing child presents no immediate threat and does not legally justify shooting.
This incident is part of a disturbing trend across the country. Similar cases in California and Virginia have seen teens killed over the same prank. But unlike those cases where suspects initially avoided arrest, Houston authorities acted within days to bring charges.
Firearm Responsibility and Judgment Matter
Whether a homeowner is startled, annoyed, or even afraid, pulling the trigger should always be a last resort, and only in the face of a real, immediate threat. This case shows what can happen when fear replaces logic and when a firearm is used inappropriately during non-threatening encounters.
Even for those with a concealed carry permit or who keep a firearm for home defense, it is critical to recognize when it’s legal and moral to use it. Firing at someone, especially a child who is clearly running away, goes against every principle of responsible gun ownership and self-defense law.
Safety Tip: Understand your state’s self-defense laws thoroughly. Owning a firearm comes with the responsibility of knowing when, and when not, to use it. Always assess the actual threat before acting.